What IS SBF Doing?

It’s obvious to any sane person watching that SBF is guilty of a lot of things. He is guilty of clear crimes and the act he’s putting up as if he is not actually intelligent enough or diligent enough to have been running his own business, is quite the defense line. I’m sure in a certain kind of jury situation they potentially could be swayed into confusion like that. It’s clear the current court of public opinion demonstrates forgiveness, including allowing SBF to be interviewed in front of people he screwed.

Some of the people SBF conned out of money are Larry Fink of BlackRock who was also in attendance, and also interviewed by Andrew Ross Sorkin. Fink’s firm lost hundreds of millions of dollars, and they are smart enough to have known what SBF was doing was fraud. In fact, they might have even laughed about it as they toasted to that 3/4 of a beer SBF talked about drinking on occasion or whatever.

SBF knew what he was doing was wrong all along. Maybe there was a day way back when where he had an actual altruistic thought. But at this point, you have to judge the actions, and yes, look at them as if they do speak louder than words. Because the words SBF speaks are not always in line with his actions.

SBF Has A Decentralized Personality Disorder

A person like SBF can lie, and tell the truth, all at the same time. That is what makes listening to him hurt your brain at times, or make you feel physically sick to your stomach. Unless of course, he’s being a certain kind of contrite where you actually hear the guy who knows he’s guilty trying to essentially put the cookies back in the cookie jar. He’s like, **you caught me. I was taking cookies in all kinds of jars and actually forgot how many there were or who I owed them to. But nobody was ever supposed to ask for me to give back the cookies before.** Andrew Ross Sorkin likened SBF to a bank teller robbing a bank.

There is no doubt that SBF did wrong up until…this writing. I mean he’s still likely hiding stolen funds and I don’t believe for a second that **his account** only has $100,000 in it. He and his parents probably have (1) account with that much money in it and they convinced themselves that that’s all there is for the purpose of an interview or comment in public. Pathological people like this can’t even help themselves sometimes in how they lie. Maybe the liberals will call it a sickness, and treat it with compassion. But regardless of how you see it or say it, SBF stole a lot of money and he full well knows that.

The Press Sucked SBF Off For Too Long To Be Trusted To Critique Him Now

The press having a conniption about the fact that a guy facing international criminal charges for a running a Ponzi scheme doesn’t flatly admit to being a criminal, is frankly immature. It just shows that these people have never faced criminal charges, or don’t want to admit they have – because of what they are. In my case, I’ve had to defend myself in court, and had a difference of opinion with the cops & the DA about what I did. The judge ultimately ruled mostly in my favor. You can’t be the judge.

You know that expression, “you be the judge.” No. In reality, the judge is the judge.

All this bullshit on social media about SBF, FTX, or anything else related, doesn’t matter.

If SBF actually got caught in a fraud with his pants down, he has had a rough month. He may still have millions stashed away somewhere, but nobody is going to give him billions for a little while (hopefully) and he certainly isn’t worth that right now. Nobody would agree to that or think that. Even the puff/hit pieces call him a former billionaire. In a world where appearance can be paramount, that matters.

The SBF vs. ARS Interview Was Softball Corny Type Whackness

But when I listened to SBF talk to Sorkin, I also heard a guy who is genuinely not sure how his thing fell apart. Furthermore, and more importantly for me (and yes, the public) is the fact that the people in the room listening to him were mostly complicit in his scam. Worse, those people gave SBF rocket fuel on whatever it was that he was doing. They validated him at Sequoia Capital. That’s a huge deal. But his thing was no-thing. What nobody is saying, though, is Sequoia Capital and their colleagues all invest in nothing businesses. In fact, they prefer nothing businesses to something businesses right now.

A nothing business is more valuable in a corrupt fund manager’s hands, because the cost is literally zero from the baseline. What I mean is, if you’re selling nothing, the cost is $0. Anything you spend in order to close a sale is marketing, operations, or some other expense. Once you don’t need to market or really have any operations, it’s all essentially profit. The second you introduce doing something real, or genuinely produce something, actual costs show up. That reduces a corrupt manager’s profit.

SBF took that principle, introduced cryptocurrency, and added international bank/wire fraud.

Credit Where Credit’s Due

But, SBF is kind of submitting an Alford plea to the public, and I suppose potential future criminal cases or pending ones. In other words, he’s willing to admit to a lot of wrongdoing, things that a court would penalize him for with money and maybe other things like stripping him of licenses or rights, etc. But ultimately it’s unlikely he’s going to jail unless the bank/mail fraud racket is actually exposed. The unfortunate conflict of interest with the media, politicians, et al might make that all impossible.

Either way, SBF is attempting to cop down what he’s done to mismanagement. That’s bad enough to have done all the damage that’s been done. From the criminal defense standpoint their argument will be essentially, “the kid’s suffered enough.” It’ll be up to the public, his victims, and courts at some point to determine whether that’s true or not. From the perspective of my mission, so long as he and his victims don’t commit literal suicide over this con collapsing, I’ll be satisfied. That’s the best case scenario here.

The way SBF keeps talking about FTX US being solvent, you have to recognize all he means is that there is enough real money underlying all of the frauds across banks that he could essentially pay back debts that were being raised for whatever the hell else they had planned. I’ve been alerting thousands to this point, so I know it is trickling into the right cracks, so to speak. SBF can run, but cannot hide from me.

If SBF is actually performing some kind of public Alford plea, I think it should just be called out that way. It is fruitless to attempt to get him to admit to being guilty of a crime, though. The reporters who might try that simply don’t know that you’re never going to get SBF to do that. I might could do it. But maybe not and regardless that’s not even required to prove guilt. In fact, the more you listen to him the more chances he has to invert your sense of what’s real and what happened. To play on your emotions.

SBF May Be Dumb, But He Isn’t Stupid

He knew he was stealing money, and knew that some day it would all blow up. The reason he’s shocked isn’t that it happened. He just didn’t know why it happened or when it happened. He still doesn’t. No person will know until they acknowledge my existence and my email sent on November 6. If you listened to the interview, SBF said many times that trouble began on November 6. He mentioned margin calls. If you don’t know what I said, it was “Margin Call Me, Maybe.” Shout out to Carly Rae Jepsen.

SBF is right to avoid saying my name, because it would undo whatever he has left of credibility. But it’s wrong from the perspective of the public, and certainly pisses me off. I think it should be no secret that I find it irksome to be ignored while doing such profound & monumental work, but I’ll say it directly now: I’m really fucking annoyed with how much I’m doing for the public, and that I get no credit. It’s fucked.

If you’re reading this, you are likely somebody in a position to actually do something about this.

So do it, already.